Seen at the Bay Cinema, Brighton, VIC
Bea says: I was keen to see this as I had
read the much-lauded book a few years ago. I had a few reservations about
the book at the time, but always enjoy a bit of a crime/mystery story and this
one is set more or less in the part of the world I find myself living in at the
moment.
The plot revolves around a high-level police
officer (Aaron Falk, played by Eric Bana), now working in Melbourne in a desk
position who returns to his home town in country Victoria to attend a funeral
of a peer. The death is considered to be a murder-suicide (and now having
lived in Australia for a few years I am newly struck how common this is on
remote properties), but Aaron begins to dig around, which is at first welcomed
by the local police, but as suspicion starts to fall on him, it is less well
received.
Aaron has some skeletons in his own closet, which
start to come out, and although he goes on to solve the murder and be
lauded by the town, the film has a strong element of noir and as a result an
air of darkness which in fact pretty accurately reflects life in country
Australia.
I left
Australia prior to the Millennium drought, and the long years of Howard's conservative
government, and have been struck since I returned by the change in country
towns which now look hard-up and depressed, particularly when compared to
the glittering boom town cities on the coast. Both the film and the book
capture this despair and the emptiness left by it in people's lives and the
culture of Australia well, but it is not uplifting viewing at all.
My main concern with the film, and with the book,
is that it felt like two stories in one. I'm fairly sure this author had
two different novels drafted out and combined them to make the book and film -
there are, for example, two endings (one where the modern murder is solved, and
one where the historical one is). The two sit a bit awkwardly for me (and
if the two stories were intentional it isn't particularly well done in my
view), but it is a relatively minor point and Cecil for example didn't
really notice this aspect of the story at all.
Definitely worth a watch, but not if you
need cheering up!
***
Cecil says: The storyline of The Dry was compelling enough to keep me
interested for the duration of the film, though there was something of a sense
of foreboding over the whole thing, it left me thinking life in country
Victoria can be pretty grim at times, and as Bea and I discussed it on our way
home afterwards, I realised that everything I was saying about it sounded
negative.
So where does leave us?
Well, there’s the plot, first. Experienced Melbourne-based
detective comes back to his home town after an apparent murder-suicide case
took place there AND he received a note from someone in the town about having
lied, and needing to tell the truth. He gets involved in helping the local cop
investigate the killings, but meantime there is a fair bit of hostility to him
from some of the town’s residents because of his own involvement with a teenage
girl who died in the local river when he was still at school.
And basically you need to keep an eye on both stories –
about both sets of deaths – as the film develops, with quite a lot of flashback
footage of the river bank frolics of the teenagers which ended in disaster. The
flashback phenomenon in story-telling is something I tend to find rather
annoying, and definitely a 21st century fashion in both
novel-writing and film-making (look at the dreadful re-make of Little Women for
how NOT to do it). It’s OK in The Dry once you work out which of the teenage
girls is the one who died and which is still living in the town some 20 years
on…
The town is full of pretty bogan rednecks, and there is a
lot of violence and drinking down at the pub. It’d be enough to put me off
living in country Victoria if I wasn’t already doing so…
One of these aggressive blokes, Grant, has a go at our hero
Melbourne-cop, but then gets roughed up himself soon after as the suspicion
falls briefly on him. But I don’t believe an experienced detective from
Melbourne would immediately assume that a note saying “Grant?” had to refer to
the bloke who had it in for him. Grant, after all, is also a noun, which could
quite plausibly have been the reference in the note and a decent cop would have
picked that up.
So, as well as the violence, the drinking, one of the newer
arrivals in town is struggling with racist attitudes, so again this really
doesn’t paint a brilliant picture of small town Australia…
And then it’s dry, and that’s the whole point. The river in
which the teenager drowned all those years ago is just a dry, muddy track now,
and although we have had a fair dowsing of rain since we saw the film, this is
the time of year when I almost lose the will to live myself, as the barren
brown dryness seems interminable after weeks and weeks without rain.
So, no, The Dry didn’t leave me in good spirits, but maybe
that says as much about my current feelings on country Australia as it does
about The Dry itself.
But, as another local to me who saw the film and loved it
said, it was refreshing to see a film set exclusively in country Victoria, and
it felt like the camera was on our lives here for the first time. She also
thought the character of the local cop, doing his best to find a way through,
managing local sentiment whole doing his job as a cop, was the most sympathetic
of all of them. I guess maybe she was right…
***