I, Claude Monet

Seen at the Rivoli Theatre, Camberwell VIC

Bea says: Cecil and I picked this out due to its time and location; we wanted to visit this cinema which is not nearby our home at all, and were fitting it in with another event we had on in that area.  I had no idea about the "Exhibition on Screen" series prior to this, and loved it.  I have to say, it was one of the most relaxing and absorbing cinema events I have been to for a long time.  The gentle music, the images of Monet's works (often repetitive, as he was known to paint the same scene many times over), fading in and out of real life footage of the scene, whilst listening to the narration of his letters, was fascinating and I could have sat there for much longer (something I actually rarely say about film, much as I enjoy the cinema).

Monet's early life was a struggle financially and for recognition, and it was interesting to listen to the tone of the letters change into his later, more well-off and established life, and watch the development of his famous garden, which I have never visited but is now definitely on my bucket list.

Highly recommended, as is anything from this series, which I shall now be following much more closely.

****

Cecil says: The film had already started when we walked in so I’m not even sure if the contemporary scene of a small ferry tug on the harbour waters (in Le Havre, I think) with a voiceover from Monet (voice of Henry Goodman) was the actual opening scene of I, Claude Monet.

But it certainly set the tone for the whole of this Exhibition on Screen genre movie, which switched between shots of Monet’s works filling the screen and contemporary footage of the places he painted.

I actually liked the way the producers faded so easily from current day footage to paintings, and it’s extraordinary in many cases how the scenes or buildings even haven’t changed that much in upto 150 years.

I had no idea in advance that this would be the whole of the film and that there would be no characters, dialogue or plot to speak of.

All the text of the voiceovers was taken from lines of Monet’s correspondence (2,500 letters apparently), so it gives little insights into different stages of the artist’s life. But it also meant that lots of things were left unanswered.

So we get the impression that this Impressionist was on the one hand overwhelmed constantly by the beauty of the natural world around him, but was also anxious and depressed a lot of the time by the penury he appeared to be living in for many years of his long life.

He writes very openly to friends and acquaintances he obviously regards as wealthier than him, asking for funds - once even for a 20 franc note, very specific that one - and intimating frequently that he would be out in the streets if funds weren’t somehow to be forthcoming.

But we never really find out what happened when he reached the edge of destitution like that or how we got himself out of each fix he was in.

Having studied 19th century French history, I was fascinated by the absence of any comment on the political context of his life (though Wikipedia suggests he was in fact quite a leftie, which means the Paris Commune of 1870 must surely have figured in his life. It actually reminded me of Flaubert whose arty character in one novel set while the 1848 revolution was raging inside Paris was lounging around the grass outside town musing on life, while the socialists battled inside the city for radical change.

It also reminded me of a film I saw some years ago called simply London, which consisted of footage of parts of London being mentioned in the (fictional?) narrative being spoken in a voiceover. These are not the sorts of films to go to for a night out, I don’t think, but I, Claude Monet kind of worked for our mood on a December Sunday, especially in such a beautiful cinema, which is a work of art itself.

I was also intrigued by the sudden appearance of Georges Clemenceau in Monet’s life. I wonder if some sort of explanatory subtitles might have helped at points like these. How many viewers - especially in a place like Australia - would even know that Clemenceau was a key political figure of his day? And how on earth did Monet come to have such connections that he can simply mention him as ‘Georges’. An early version of ‘Tony’, ‘Gordon’ and then ‘Dave’ in the UK?

***.5  

Ladies in Black

Seen at the Regent Theatre, Ballarat, VIC

Cecil says: Ladies in Black is the kind of film I could go and see over and over again, and probably always pick up new little insights into life in 1959 (the year of my birth, funnily enough, so I don’t have actual memories of that time myself!). It stands alongside Strictly Ballroom as one of those films I will no doubt see more than once and not tire of, so it must be my top film of 2018, I think.

There are so many aspects that make this a charming watch: the coming-of-age (but not at all in a sexual way) of school-leaver Lisa (one of the big moves she makes to ‘come of age’ is to drop her androgynous name ‘Lesley’ and start a new life at work as ‘Lisa”); the arrival and gradual acceptance of ‘new’ migrants from other parts of Europe than the UK and Ireland; the social limits on behaviour and propriety, leading to some hilarious and some touching moments, as two of the Ladies in Black deal with developing relationships.

It’s all set in Sydney, so any shots with backdrop to the City and CBD are obviously computer-generated, but there is also careful filming on the harbour, managing to avoid any new build that has sprung up since the 1950s, and use of that beautiful old department store building in the city with its original façade.

As a child in Sydney in 1967, I became a geeky ‘collector’ of bus numbers and destinations, so I know that Circular Quay was the main bus destination in those days (rather than the current-day Wynyard), so the child geek in me was pleased to see Circular Quay on the front of many of the buses shown in Ladies in Black.

There were slightly melodramatic characters like Magda, who managed the up-market couture dresses in the store and was obviously used to mixing in finer circles than other shop assistants, but was having to adapt to Australia’s more working-class but increasingly affluent society.

And there were the lovely cameo characters like Miss Cartwright, who had a soft spot for Lisa from the start, and obviously wants her to make the most of the opportunities open to young women in 1959 that weren’t there for women oi her generation. She’s almost the most beautiful character in the film, managing to overcome any regrets at an unfulfilled life herself to wish well to a new generation starting out.

I was a bit confused at first over the two brunettes who were friends and colleagues of Fay. I thought they were the same person at the start, which is another reason to see this film again.

And in a sense, although Lisa was the central character, it was Fay whose story we followed as closely and who spoke for her own generation at the time: intelligent but not educated; fed up with boorish men in their lives; but lacking opportunities to break out, until the arrival of the new immigrants into Australia.

Well, these are just a few of the highlights for me. I’m sure on second viewing, I’ll find more favourite bits to comment on, so look forward to when it comes back to some cinemas for a second run…

*****

Bea says: I was very keen to see this film because when I saw the preview (at the cinema attending another film) I saw that one of the storylines is about the arrival of the "New Australians" during the 1940s-early 1970s and their assimilation into Australian life.  I am very interested in this topic, as I am the daughter of New Australians myself, and I have just started to notice with pleasure more in Australian literature and film on this - I suspect because the children of the New Australians are now well into adulthood and are writing and making films and art about their influences.

However, Ladies in Black in actually based on an early novel by Madeleine St John - who I know from her later, award winning work The Essence of the Thing; I had no idea she was even Australian, and from my (brief) recent research into her after seeing Ladies in Black I don't think she is of New Australian stock.  It turns out she was at Sydney University with Bruce Beresford, the film's director, and I suspect that Ladies in Black is a coming of age, semi-autobiographical work of hers; she is likely to have identified pretty strongly with Lisa (Lesley), who is busy having her horizons opened (by the New Australians) and reinventing herself during her summer department store job, before starting her first term at Sydney University.  I have to say that Sydney University is a pretty magical place; I spent a year teaching there on a contract in 2017, and my heart skipped with excitement whenever I walked through the main campus - it really feels like a historic place where any possibility can happen...

Other than Lisa's storyline, we follow several other of the department store staff, who are all at different moments in their lives and so the film explores such things as finding a partner, marriage and infertility, spinsterhood, work and life decisions, but with Beresford's light touch, wry sense of humour and beautiful cinematography.

It certainly really spoke to me, and to Cecil, but I have heard mixed reviews amongst friends.  But I say - go and see it; it may speak volumes to you about your life, or not, but if not it will certainly be a pleasant diversion, particularly if you have any memories of Sydney life in earlier decades.  I also gifted the DVD to my parents for Christmas.

*****