Cecil says: This film was awful, in spite of its excellent cast.
We had put off going because we had a hunch and sadly all our fears were
well-founded. And in the end, it was the film that was starting just as we got
to the cinema on a Sunday morning, so we went for it anyway.
I’m trying to find some redeeming features to talk about: the only
character who felt remotely believable was Diane Keaton’s son: slightly roguish,
fairly posh son who pops round to his Mum’s Hampstead flat unannounced, gets
breakfast and probes into her private life.
For the rest, the characters felt more like the fantasies so many
second-rate American writers have of what it is to be English (or even Irish in
Brendan Gleeson’s case): somehow the men are always debonair, middle-aged and
wealthy, usually with a posh accent, or are stone-the-crows cor blimey guv
Cockneys. Like Americans never came across Estuary English or just an average
Joe or Jill?
This film felt like the sort of script a young tourist might write after
her first visit to London. She discovered some of the cute nooks and crannies
of Hampstead and just had to let everyone in on her ‘discoveries’ (I say ‘her’,
but actually I think it was written by a man); she got the right bus route,
pointed out the Marx grave in the cemetery (Highgate of course), even
calculated more or less how far it was from Hampstead to Camden, but then made
it unreal with the ridiculously ditzy Diane Keaton character, the caricature
accountant, and then the Gleeson character: based on a real person, but so so
badly- developed (he’d say and do things that were just not what a guy like
that would do: he became a kind of goofy American caricature). Even his perfect
veggie patch in amongst the trees felt unbelievable – we know how hard it is to
grow vegetables in ground that get little sunlight, and his shack was hidden
away in the depths of the Hampstead Heath trees.
I could go on and on picking holes in this film but why rack my brain to
pick it apart anymore.
Best forgotten.
Stars? Zero or maybe 0.5…
Bea says: Yes, complete disappointment.
As
Cecil says, clearly written by someone who has visited London and fallen in
love with it (understandable – I did the same).
But the writer would have been better writing about someone visiting
London and falling in love with it, rather than trying to write about two
mature “loveable eccentrics” meeting each other in Hampstead.
The characters were unbelievable despite
apparently being based on real people, the plot was unbelievable, and the
clichés were jarring. Keaton and Gleeson
are both capable of much more, although I do tire of Keaton’s constant Annie Hall reprisal. The fact that they couldn’t save it showed
how bad the script was.
I was flabbergasted that this actually got made,
released, and was on a quite a widespread cinema run at the time we saw
it. This may work as a telemovie on a
rainy Sunday afternoon, but in general – avoid.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment